No, leiste la nota? Ahi dice que miyamoto decia otra cosa...
“This is an old story, but Hollywood did a film version of the Mario Bros. many years back. There was a scene in the script where they needed a last name for the characters. Somebody suggested that, because they were the Mario Bros., their last name should be Mario. So, they made him “Mario Mario.” I heard this and laughed rather loudly. Of course, this was ultimately included in the film. Based on the film, that’s [how] their names ended up. But, just like Mickey Mouse doesn’t really have a last name, Mario is really just Mario and Luigi is really just Luigi.”
vicgus wrote:No, leiste la nota? Ahi dice que miyamoto decia otra cosa...
“This is an old story, but Hollywood did a film version of the Mario Bros. many years back. There was a scene in the script where they needed a last name for the characters. Somebody suggested that, because they were the Mario Bros., their last name should be Mario. So, they made him “Mario Mario.” I heard this and laughed rather loudly. Of course, this was ultimately included in the film. Based on the film, that’s [how] their names ended up. But, just like Mickey Mouse doesn’t really have a last name, Mario is really just Mario and Luigi is really just Luigi.”
No, pero te puedo asegurar que mucho antes que saliera la pelicula, yo lo habia leido en una revista del medio, es mas, en una club nintendo. Te aseguro que yo sabia esto antes de la paparruchada de la peli.
Un comentario que encontre en la red que quiza pueda traer luz a esto...
"Inicialmente eran los Mario Bross por una tradición japonesa, en que los hermanos como grupo se denominan por el hermano mayor, el que tiene precedente. Recordemos que Japón tiene una complejísima estructura respecto a los honoríficos."